Computed Tomography Angiography for Aortic Diseases.

Aortic pathologies encompass a heterogeneous group of disorders, including acute aortic syndrome, traumatic aortic injury , aneurysm, aortitis, and atherosclerosis. The clinical manifestations of these disorders can be varied and non-specific, ranging from acute presentations in the emergency department to chronic incidental findings in an outpatient setting. Given the non-specific nature of their clinical presentations, the reliance on non-invasive imaging for screening, definitive diagnosis, therapeutic strategy planning, and post-intervention surveillance has become paramount. Commonly used imaging modalities include ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), and MR imaging. Among these modalities, computed tomography angiography (CTA) has emerged as a first-line imaging modality owing to its excellent anatomic detail, widespread availability, established imaging protocols, evidence-proven indications, and rapid acquisition time.

The Role of Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta.

Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) has been utilized by trauma surgeons at the bedside for over a decade in both civilian and military settings. Both translational and clinical research suggest it is superior to resuscitative thoracotomy for specific patient populations. Technological advancements in recent years have significantly enhanced the safety profile of REBOA. Resuscitative balloon occlusion of the aorta has also swiftly found implementation in patients in shock from non-traumatic hemorrhage.

Critical systolic blood pressure threshold for endovascular aortic occlusion-A multinational analysis to determine when to place a REBOA.

BACKGROUND: Systolic blood pressure (SBP) is a potential indicator that could guide when to use a resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) in trauma patients with life-threatening injuries. This study aims to determine the optimal SBP threshold for REBOA placement by analyzing the association between SBP pre-REBOA and 24-hour mortality in severely injured hemodynamically unstable trauma patients. METHODS: We performed a pooled analysis of the aortic balloon occlusion (ABO) trauma and AORTA registries. These databases record the details related to the use of REBOA and include data from 14 countries worldwide. We included patients who had suffered penetrating and/or blunt trauma. Patients who arrived at the hospital with a SBP pre-REBOA of 0 mm Hg and remained at 0 mm Hg after balloon inflation were excluded. We evaluated the impact that SBP pre-REBOA had on the probability of death in the first 24 hours. RESULTS: A total of 1,107 patients underwent endovascular aortic occlusion, of these, 848 met inclusion criteria. The median age was 44 years (interquartile range [IQR], 27-59 years) and 643 (76%) were male. The median injury severity score was 34 (IQR, 25-45). The median SBP pre-REBOA was 65 mm Hg (IQR, 49-88 mm Hg). Mortality at 24 hours was reported in 279 (32%) patients. Math modeling shows that predicted probabilities of the primary outcome increased steadily in SBP pre-REBOA below 100 mm Hg. Multivariable mixed-effects analysis shows that when SBP pre-REBOA was lower than 60 mm Hg, the risk of death was more than 50% (relative risk, 1.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.17-1.92; p = 0.001). DISCUSSION: In patients who do not respond to initial resuscitation, the use of REBOA in SBPs between 60 mm Hg and 80 mm Hg may be a useful tool in resuscitation efforts before further decompensation or complete cardiovascular collapse. The findings from our study are clinically important as a first step in identifying candidates for REBOA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level IV.

Vascular access complications associated with resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in adult trauma patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is gaining popularity worldwide for managing hypotensive trauma patients. Vascular access complications related to REBOA placement have been reported, with some cases resulting in permanent morbidity. We aim to capitalize on the increase in literature to further describe and estimate the incidence of REBOA-associated vascular access complications in adult trauma patients. METHODS: We searched Medline, EMBASE, Scopus, and CINAHL for studies reporting vascular access complications of REBOA in adult trauma patients from inception to October 14, 2021. Studies reporting data from adult trauma patients who underwent REBOA insertion were eligible. Exclusion criteria included patients 15 years and younger, nontrauma patients, non-REBOA use, non-vascular access complications and patient duplication. Study data was abstracted using the PRISMA checklist and verified independently by three reviewers. Meta-analysis of proportions was performed using a random effects model with Freeman-Turkey double-arcsine transformation. Post hoc meta-regression by year of publication, sheath-size, and geographic region was also performed. The incidence of vascular access complications from REBOA insertion was the primary outcome of interest. Subgroup analysis was performed by degree of bias, sheath size, technique of vascular access, provider specialty, geographical region, and publication year. RESULTS: Twenty-four articles were included in the systematic review and the meta-analysis, for a total of 675 trauma patients who underwent REBOA insertion. The incidence of vascular access complications was 8% (95% confidence interval, 5%-13%). In post hoc meta-regression adjusting for year of publication and geographic region, the use of a smaller (7-Fr) sheath was associated with a decreased incidence of vascular access complications (odds ratio, 0.87; 95% confidence interval, 0.75-0.99; p = 0.046; R 2 = 35%; I 2 = 48%). CONCLUSION: This study provides a benchmark for quality of care in terms of vascular access complications related to REBOA insertion in adult trauma patients. Smaller sheath size may be associated with a decrease in vascular access complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis; Level III.

Intra-stent aortic wall aneurysm formation after Be-graft covered stent implant.

Aortic wall injuries may occur after interventional treatment of aortic coarctation (CoA), especially after balloon angioplasty. We reported on a patient who presented with an intra-stent aneurysm formation after direct stenting of a native near atretic aortic CoA by using a BeGraft Aortic stent. This evidence supports the need to maintain a strict follow-up protocol. A computed tomography scan is mandatory, after covered stent implantation as well, especially in high-risk cases and even in the absence of any immediate apparent complication.

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Nonoperative Management for SVS Grade II Blunt Traumatic Aortic Injury.

BACKGROUND: Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) grade II blunt traumatic aortic injury is defined as intramural hematoma with or without external contour abnormality. It is uncertain whether this aortic injury pattern should be treated with endovascular stent-grafting or nonoperative measures. Since the adoption of the SVS Guidelines on endovascular repair of blunt traumatic aortic injury, the practice pattern for management of grade II injuries has been heterogenous. The objective of the study was to report natural history outcomes of grade II blunt traumatic aortic injury. METHODS: A systematic review of published traumatic aortic injury studies was performed. Online database searches were current to November 2022. Eligible studies included data on aortic injuries that were both managed nonoperatively and classified according to the SVS 2011 Guidelines. Data points on all-cause mortality, aorta-related mortality and early aortic intervention were extracted and underwent meta-analysis. The methodology was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidance. RESULTS: Thirteen studies were included in the final analysis with a total of 204 cases of SVS grade II blunt traumatic aortic injury treated nonoperatively. The outcomes rates were estimated at 10.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.7%-14.9%) for all-cause mortality, 2.9% (95% CI 1.1%-5.7%) for aorta-related mortality, and 3.3% (95% CI 1.4%-6.2%) for early aortic intervention. The studies included in the analysis were of fair quality with a mean Downs and Black score 15 (±1.8). CONCLUSIONS: Grade II blunt traumatic aortic injury follows a relatively benign course with few instances of aortic-related mortality. Death in the setting of this injury pattern is more often attributable to sequelae of multisystem trauma and not directly related to aortic injury. The current data support nonoperative management and imaging surveillance for grade II blunt traumatic aortic injury instead of endovascular repair. Longer-term effects on the aorta at the site of injury are unknown.

Mejora en el manejo de la sospecha del síndrome aórtico agudo en urgencias mediante un algoritmo clínico y el estudio de factores predictivos / Improvement in the management of suspected acute aortic syndrome in the emergency room through a clinical algorithm and study of predictive factors

Antecedentes y objetivo: El síndrome aórtico agudo (SAA) es poco frecuente y difícil de diagnosticar, con una gran variabilidad en su cuadro clínico inicial. Los objetivos son: 1) desarrollar un algoritmo informático, o un sistema de apoyo a las decisiones clínicas (SADC), para el manejo y la solicitud de estudios de diagnóstico por imagen en el servicio de Urgencias, en concreto de una tomografía computarizada (TC) de la aorta, ante la sospecha de SAA, 2) determinar el efecto de la implantación de este sistema, y 3) determinar los factores asociados a un diagnóstico radiológico positivo que mejoren la capacidad predictiva de los hallazgos de la TC de aorta. Material y métodos: Tras desarrollar e implementar un algoritmo basado en la evidencia, se estudiaron casos de sospecha de SAA. Se utilizó el test de la χ2 para analizar la asociación entre las variables incluidas en el algoritmo y el diagnóstico radiológico, con 3 categorías: sin hallazgos relevantes, positivo para SAA y diagnósticos alternativos. Resultados: Se identificaron 130 solicitudes; 19 (14,6%) tenían SAA y 34 (26,2%) tenían otra patología aguda. De las 19 con SAA, 15 habían sido estratificadas como de alto riesgo y 4 como de riesgo intermedio. La probabilidad de SAA era 3,4 veces mayor en los pacientes con aneurisma aórtico conocido (p=0,021, IC del 95%: 1,2-9,6) y 5,1 veces mayor en los pacientes con un soplo de insuficiencia vascular aórtica de novo(p=0,019, IC del 95 %: 1,3-20,1). La probabilidad de tener una enfermedad aguda grave alternativa fue 3,2 veces mayor en los pacientes con hipotensión o choque (p=0,02, IC del 95 %: 1,2-8,5). Conclusión: El uso de un SADC en el servicio de Urgencias puede ayudar a optimizar el diagnóstico del SAA. Se demostró que la presencia de un aneurisma aórtico conocido y de insuficiencia valvular aórtica de nueva aparición aumentan significativamente la probabilidad de SAA. Se necesitan más estudios para establecer una regla de predicción clínica.(AU)

Background and objective: Acute aortic syndrome (AAS) is uncommon and difficult to diagnose, with great variability in clinical presentation. To develop a computerized algorithm, or clinical decision support system (CDSS), for managing and requesting imaging in the emergency department, specifically computerized tomography of the aorta (CTA), when there is suspicion of AAS, and to determine the effect of implementing this system. To determine the factors associated with a positive radiological diagnosis that improve the predictive capacity of CTA findings. Materials and methods: After developing and implementing an evidence-based algorithm, we studied suspected cases of AAS. Chi-squared test was used to analyze the association between the variables included in the algorithm and radiological diagnosis, with 3 categories: no relevant findings, positive for AAS, and alternative diagnoses. Results: 130 requests were identified; 19 (14.6%) had AAS and 34 (26.2%) had a different acute pathology. Of the 19 with AAS, 15 had been stratified as high risk and 4 as intermediate risk. The probability of AAS was 3.4 times higher in patients with known aortic aneurysm (P=.021, 95% CI 1.2–9.6) and 5.1 times higher in patients with a new aortic regurgitation murmur (P=.019, 95% CI 1.3–20.1). The probability of having an alternative severe acute pathology was 3.2 times higher in patients with hypotension or shock (P=.02, 95% CI 1.2–8.5). Conclusion: The use of a CDSS in the emergency department can help optimize AAS diagnosis. The presence of a known aortic aneurysm and new-onset aortic regurgitation were shown to significantly increase the probability of AAS. Further studies are needed to establish a clinical prediction rule.(AU)

Diagnóstico y tratamiento de disección aórtica. Revisión bibliográfica / Diagnosis and treatment of aortic dissection. Literature review

La disección aórtica representa una afección relativamente poco común pero potencialmente mortal que se debe a un desgarro en la capa íntima de la arteria aorta o sangrado dentro de su pared, lo que da como resultado una separación de las capas de esta. Se han identificado varios factores de riesgo y comparten los mismos que para otras enfermedades cardiovasculares, como la edad, la hipertensión arterial, la dislipidemia y los trastornos genéticos del tejido conectivo. Es muy importante que el clínico pueda realizar un diagnóstico oportuno y un tratamiento adecuado en los pacientes afectados. El tipo de tratamiento depende de la extensión y de la localización de la disección. La reparación quirúrgica abierta suele ser la más usada para aquellas en las que están involucradas la aorta ascendente y el arco aórtico; por otro lado, la intervención endovascular está recomendada para las disecciones de la aorta descendente, que suelen ser complicadas. En este trabajo se revisará la epidemiología, la fisiopatología, las manifestaciones clínicas y finalmente el manejo de la disección aórtica.(AU)

Aortic dissection represents a relatively rare but highly fatal condition that is due to a tear in the intimal layer ofthe aortic artery or bleeding within its wall, resulting in a separation of its layers. Several risk factors have beenidentifi ed and share the same as for other cardiovascular diseases such as age, high blood pressure, dyslipidemiaand genetic disorders of connective tissue.It is very important that the clinician can make a timely diagnosis and appropriate treatment in patients affectedby it; the type of treatment depends on the extent and location of the dissection. open surgical repair is usuallythe most used for those that involve the ascending aorta and the aortic arch, on the other hand, endovascularintervention is recommended for dissections of the descending aorta that are usually complicated.In this work, the epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical manifestations and finally the management of aorticdissection will be reviewed.(AU)

Management of Pediatric Aortic Pseudoaneurysm Due to Penetrating Trauma.

Due to the increasing frequency of pediatric penetrating trauma, pediatric surgeons need to be prepared to evaluate and manage complex penetrating injuries. In this report, we discuss the endovascular management of a traumatic aortic pseudoaneurym and subsequent bullet retrieval following penetrating chest trauma in a child. The key to successful management included multidisciplinary decision making and use of an expandable covered stent generally used for management of aortic coarctation.

Titratable partial aortic occlusion: Extending Zone I endovascular occlusion times.

BACKGROUND: Extending the time to definitive hemorrhage control in noncompressible torso hemorrhage (NCTH) is of particular importance in the battlefield where transfer times are prolonged and NCTH remains the leading cause of death. While resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta is widely practiced as an initial adjunct for the management of NCTH, concerns for ischemic complications after 30 minutes of compete aortic occlusion deters many from zone 1 deployment. We hypothesize that extended zone 1 occlusion times will be enabled by novel purpose-built devices that allow for titratable partial aortic occlusion. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional analysis describing pREBOA-PRO zone 1 deployment characteristics at seven level 1 trauma centers in the United States and Canada (March 30, 2021, and June 30, 2022). To compare patterns of zone 1 aortic occlusion, the AORTA registry was used. Data were limited to adult patients who underwent successful occlusion in zone 1 (2013-2022). RESULTS: One hundred twenty-two patients pREBOA-PRO patients were included. Most catheters were deployed in zone 1 (n = 89 [73%]) with a median zone 1 total occlusion time of 40 minutes (interquartile range, 25-74). A sequence of complete followed by partial occlusion was used in 42% (n = 37) of zone 1 occlusion patients; a median of 76% (interquartile range, 60-87%) of total occlusion time was partial occlusion in this group. As was seen in the prospectively collected data, longer median total occlusion times were observed in the titratable occlusion group in AORTA compared with the complete occlusion group. CONCLUSION: Longer zone 1 aortic occlusion times seen with titratable aortic occlusion catheters appear to be driven by the feasibility of controlled partial occlusion. The ability to extend safe aortic occlusion times may have significant impact to combat casualty care where exsanguination from NCTH is the leading source of potentially preventable deaths. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level IV.

Early Versus Delayed Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Blunt Thoracic Aortic Injury: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: We examined early (≤24 h) versus delayed (>24 h) thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for blunt thoracic aortic injury (BTAI), taking the aortic injury severity into consideration. BACKGROUND: Current trauma surgery guidelines recommend delayed TEVAR following BTAI. However, this recommendation was based on small studies, and specifics regarding recommendation strategies based on aortic injury grades are lacking. METHODS: Patients undergoing TEVAR for BTAI in the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program between 2016 and 2019 were included and then stratified into 2 groups (early: ≤24 h vs. delayed: >24 h). In-hospital outcomes were compared after creating 1:1 propensity score-matched cohorts, matching for demographics, comorbidities, concomitant injuries, additional procedures, and aortic injury severity based on the acute aortic syndrome (AAS) classification. RESULTS: Overall, 1339 patients were included, of whom 1054(79%) underwent early TEVAR. Compared with the delayed group, the early group had significantly less severe head injuries (early vs delayed; 25% vs 32%; P =0.014), fewer early interventions for AAS grade 1 occurred, and AAS grade 3 aortic injuries often were intervened upon within 24 hours (grade 1: 28% vs 47%; grade 3: 49% vs 23%; P <0.001). After matching, the final sample included 548 matched patients. Compared with the delayed group, the early group had a significantly higher in-hospital mortality (8.8% vs 4.4%, relative risk: 2.2, 95% CI: 1.1-4.4; P =0.028), alongside a shorter length of hospital stay (5.0 vs 10 days; P =0.028), a shorter intensive care unit length of stay (4.0 vs 11 days; P <0.001) and fewer days on the ventilator (4.0 vs 6.5 days; P =0.036). Furthermore, regardless of the higher risk of acute kidney injury in the delayed group (3.3% vs 7.7%, relative risk: 0.43, 95% CI: 0.20-0.92; P =0.029), no other differences in in-hospital complications were observed between the early and delayed group. CONCLUSION: In this propensity score-matched analysis, delayed TEVAR was associated with lower mortality risk, even after adjusting for aortic injury grade.

Management of Penetrating Injury to the Esophagus Into the Aorta by a Fishbone.

A 66-year-old man was reported to have persistent chest pain for 4 hours after accidentally swallowing a fishbone. An isolated esophageal foreign body (EFB) was suspected in the community hospital. In our center, an emergency chest CT scan revealed an EFB in the upper part of the esophagus of the patient which penetrated the left esophageal wall as well as the distal aortic arch. However, the experience of the treatment strategy for this lesion is still not enough available. Considering the surgical trauma and the risk associated with advanced age of the patient, the option for open surgery was waived. In addition, there was also a risk of sudden death due to aortic rupture that could occur after direct removal of the fishbone. Therefore, emergency thoracic endovascular aortic repair was performed and the fishbone was removed under an endoscope. The patient successfully pulled through without any discomfort, with no complications.

Blunt Trauma to Brachiocephalic Artery: Presentation and Management.

Isolated innominate artery injury is very rare and accounts for less than 3% of recognized arterial injuries. Surgical exploration of the artery, especially at the origin of the artery from the arch of the aorta, is surgically challenging. Due to its rarity, any 1 surgeon's experience in dealing with innominate artery injury is bound to be limited. We report 2 cases of innominate artery injury post-blunt chest trauma. Both patients underwent thoracotomy and innominate artery Dacron graft repair and both had an uneventful postoperative course.

Tandem use of gastroesophageal resuscitative occlusion of the aorta followed by resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in a lethal liver laceration model.

BACKGROUND: Gastroesophageal resuscitative occlusion of the aorta (GROA) has been shown effective in creating zone II aortic occlusion capable of temporarily improving survival in animal models of lethal noncompressible torso hemorrhage. In this study, tandem application of GROA transitioning to resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is explored to demonstrate feasibility as a potential point-of-injury bridge to more advanced care, using a swine model of lethal abdominal hemorrhage. METHODS: Swine (n = 19) were anesthetized, instrumented, and subjected to a combination of controlled and uncontrolled hemorrhage from a grade-V liver laceration. Animals were designated as intervention (n = 9; GROA to REBOA) or control (n = 10), for 60 minutes. Following intervention, devices were deactivated, and animals received blood and crystalloid resuscitation. Animals were monitored for 4 hours. RESULTS: Injury resulted in onset of class IV shock in all animals with a mean arterial pressure (SD) of 24.5 (4.11) mm Hg at the start of intervention. Nine of 10 controls died during the intervention period with a median (interquartile) survival time of 8.5 (9.25) minutes. All animals receiving the intervention survived both the 60-minute intervention period demonstrating a significant survival improvement ( p = 0.0007). Transition from GROA to REBOA was successful in all animals with a transition time ranging from 30 to 90 seconds. Mean arterial pressure significantly improved in animals receiving GROA to REBOA for the duration of intervention, regardless of the method of aortic occlusion, with a range of 70.9 (16.04) mm Hg to 101.1 (15.3) mm Hg. Additional hemodynamics, metrics of shock, and oxygenation remained stable during intervention. CONCLUSION: Less invasive technologies such as GROA may present an opportunity to control noncompressible torso hemorrhage more rapidly, with a subsequent transition to more advanced care such as REBOA.

Quantitative study of aortic strain injuries originating from traffic accidents.

Aortic injuries are the second leading cause of death after head injuries due to traffic accidents, and strain-induced injuries are becoming increasingly prominent. The quantitative study of aortic strain injury allows for a rapid assessment of the degree of aortic injury after an accident and timely diagnosis of the pathology of aortic injury. It is more reliable than diagnosis based on clinical symptoms alone and it is faster than diagnosis based on imaging. Based on the porcine aortic tensile and injury tests, this study obtained the maximum stress threshold of the aorta that can withstand tensile stress and the safe stress threshold under tensile action, which provides a more detailed data reference about aortic injury in the field of internal medicine. Injuries to the aorta under various degrees of traction were analyzed in detail. A comprehensive and quantitative evaluation criterion for aortic strain injury was proposed, which provides a more in-depth reference for the mechanism of aortic strain injury. In addition, combining it with current imaging promises a combination of numbers and shapes for rapid and accurate diagnosis of aortic strain injury.

Do we need pre-hospital resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) in the civilian helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS)?

Pre-hospital resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) can be a life-saving procedure for patients with non-compressible torso hemorrhage. We aimed to evaluate the potential eligibility for REBOA in trauma patients of a civilian helicopter emergency medical service (HEMS) using a stepwise approach. A retrospective analysis using the electronic database (HEMSDER) of "DRF Luftrettung" HEMS covering the period from January 2015 to June 2021 was performed. Trauma patients aged ≥ 16 years and with a National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA) score of ≥ 4 were assessed for potential REBOA eligibility using two different decision trees based on assumed severe bleeding due to injuries of the abdomen, pelvis, and/or lower extremities and different vital signs on the scene and at hospital handover. Non-parametric statistical methods were used for comparison. A total of 22.426 patients met the inclusion criteria for data analysis. Of these, 0.15-2.24% were possible candidates for pre-hospital REBOA. No significant differences between groups on scene and at hospital handover regarding demographics, assumed injuries, and pre-hospital interventions were found. In the on-scene group, 21.1% of the patients remained unstable even at hospital handover despite pre-hospital care. In the handover group, 42.8% of the patients seemed initially stable but then deteriorated during the pre-hospital course. The number of potential pre-hospital REBOA in severely injured patients with a NACA score of ≥ 4 is < 3% or can be even < 1% if more strict criteria are used. There are some patients who may benefit from pre-hospital REBOA as a life-saving procedure. Further research on earlier diagnosis of life-threatening bleeding and proper indications of REBOA in trauma patients is needed.

An unusual occurrence of penetrating aortic arch injury by a ball-point pen: a case report and review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Aortic arch injuries account for about 8% of thoracic aortic injuries. Penetrating zone I neck injuries account for 18% of vascular injuries in the neck and have great potential to traverse to involve thoracic vascular structures as well. The hard and soft signs of vascular injury facilitate triage of patients on an individual basis. We present a case of a ball-point pen traversing through zone I of the neck and causing penetrating aortic arch injury with minimal mediastinal haemorrhage. CASE PRESENTATION: We present a polytrauma patient who was admitted with traumatic brain injury and a ball-point pen lodged above the sternal notch in zone I of the neck following a road traffic accident. He underwent mediastinal exploration via a median sternotomy. The ball-point pen was found penetrating the anterior wall of the aortic arch and resting in its lumen. The ball-point pen was successfully explanted and primary repair of the penetrating aortic arch injury was done. He had an uneventful recovery without any added secondary neurological complications. CONCLUSION: Penetrating aortic arch injuries are rare compared to injuries of the ascending aorta and descending aorta. They require a high index of suspicion, rapid investigation and urgent intervention in view of their high associated fatality. The ball-point pen in this case assumed the shape of a plug which acted as a seal at the site of injury preventing catastrophic exsanguination.